<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>deweber design - Latest Comments in star trek</title><link>http://deweberdesign.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://deweberdesign.disqus.com/star_trek/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 09:06:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: star trek</title><link>http://deweberdesign.com/2009/05/06/star-trek/#comment-9203086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;nice. i'm looking forward to seeing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">deWeb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 09:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: star trek</title><link>http://deweberdesign.com/2009/05/06/star-trek/#comment-9201293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude, here's my standpoint.  If they want new movies, they're gonna have to be flexible.  We can either leave the precious Star Trek Canon alone and never have new, fun movies to go see, or we can allow for a little creative interpretation and be able to experience some new adventures aboard the U.S.S Enterprise.  I much prefer the latter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I saw it, and thoroughly enjoyed it.  Didn't want it to end.  Can't wait till the next one comes out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angela </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 08:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: star trek</title><link>http://deweberdesign.com/2009/05/06/star-trek/#comment-9068331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam, thanks for bringing this important issue the attention it deserves.  I, too, worry that the new Star Trek movie is too accessible and that the youth of today are not learning Klingon like they should.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony McCollum</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:02:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>